Where
there is content, there will be advertising. Hence,
it is no surprise that we find a lot of ads in the
raging sea of content that is the World Wide Web (Web
from now). Banner ads and its cousins (e.g. pop-up,
pop-under, superstitial, interstitial) are an integral
part of our online lives. We now expect to see these
ads as much as we expect to see content.
Advertising was a very common business strategy in
the first wave of E-Commerce. Many entrepreneurs used
the TV model to price Web content- that is, content
was free so long as you agreed to watch a few ads
and/or provide personal information. As a result,
free content (e.g. portals such as Yahoo, news providers
such as timesofindia.indiatimes.com) and free services
(e.g. e-mail, chat, groups) became the norm.
Advertisers keen on making a splash in the new medium
poured a lot of money into it. As shown in Figure
1, total spending on Internet advertising, peaked
in Q4, 2000 at $2.162 billion. However, with the slowdown
in economic activity, the ad market has hit a slump
with revenues decreasing in each of the last five
quarters to a low of $1.55 billion in Q1, 2002.
This is a short-term phenomenon that is sure to turn
around. But, this is a good time to take a good, hard
look at Internet advertising. In this article, I provide
the reader with five prescriptions about online advertising.
Advertising
does not lead to immediate response
In no medium does advertising lead to an immediate
behavioral response. Consumers do not run out of
their houses every time they see an ad for a new
product or service. Rather, advertising works slowly
by increasing awareness and the comfort levels of
individuals. The message has to seep into the consciousness
of the person before there can be interest in the
message. Only after this will a person go out and
try something new.
What this means is that the click-through rate,
by itself, is essentially meaningless. If consumers
do not click on an ad, that does not make it ineffective.
Consumers who are influenced by the ad may return
after a while even though they may not have clicked
on it. Similarly, if a consumer clicks on an ad,
it does not automatically make it effective. Frequently,
we see that there is no clear post-click call for
action. A consumer may click on a banner and be
taken to a site with 10,000 sub-pages. The consumer
may be befuddled by this, back off, and never return.
But the advertiser counts this as a click-through
and is delighted at the result. This is a particular
problem with ads designed to resemble a sites
content (e.g., with buttons that say OK!
or Click here!).
I can almost see a sophisticated reader immediately
say- Of course, it is not about click-throughs.
Rather, it is about conversion rates- i.e., what
happens after the click-through.
I will submit to you that this approach is also
inadequate because it expects an immediate behavioral
response. What is needed is a comprehensive measurement
system that looks not just at changes in behavior,
but also in consumer attitudes towards the ad and
the brand. There can be an immediate change in attitude,
but rarely is there an immediate change in behavior.
Targeting
trumps annoyance
Currently, there is a movement to increase the annoyance
factor of ads. It has become common to have multiple
pop-up ads. As a user closes one screen, another
pops up. At the end of the session, the user may
have closed 4 or even 5 screens. The superstitial
ad is similarly very intrusive. Individuals are
assaulted with a TV-style ad and may not even have
the option of closing it in some cases.
The argument behind these ads is that consumers
will not pay attention to ads unless they receive
a slap in the face. I have met some online advertising
companies who boast of the increased click through
rates when they use these techniques. What they
do not know anything about is the number of people
who were completely turned off by the ad. Some consumers
are now swearing off leading advertisers who use
pop-ups or pop-unders (X10, Orbitz and Verisign
in the US) and the backlash is only likely to increase.
In direct contrast, look at the ad strategy of Google,
the worlds leading search engine. The company
uses a very targeted approach to advertising. Companies
can only buy text ads that will appear when users
search for a certain keyword. The ads are clearly
marked and appear either at the top of the search
listings or on the side. There is no banner ad on
the home page of Google!
Is it any wonder that this high level of targeting
brings in more revenue? As shown in Figure 2, the
top two categories of ad revenue are search engines
and classifieds. Both categories offer a high level
of targeting and a low level of intrusion!
What consumers need online is not a slap in their
face, but an ad that targets their needs, their
personality and their lifestyle.
Advertise
to a few
Publishers who took a free approach to content and
service pricing, counted on building up huge customer
databases and traffic numbers. While this is a legitimate
advertising practice, niching as an advertising
strategy has been seriously underused on the Web.
This is especially surprising because the Web is
very conducive for advertising to niche groups.
There are many web sites that will never have the
audience numbers of Yahoo. But, these sites provide
advertisers the chance to appear before a group
that is tightly defined and is homogenous in many
respects.
At this point, many publishers are moving from free
to fee. This does not necessarily mean the demise
of advertising as a revenue stream. You can still
advertise to paying subscribers. In many cases,
subscribers who pay are those with a greater interest
in what you have to say and have a greater commitment
to your brand. As a result, they will not mind seeing
advertising. However, the quantity of advertising
may have to be reduced, which takes us nicely to
my next point.
Decrease
supply of banner ads
There are too many ads on the Web. In a push to
earn more ad revenue, publishers have increased
the number of ads on their pages. But, as the number
of ads on a page increase, the effectiveness of
all ads decreases. This is because this increases
the number of objects competing for the consumers
attention. Instead, if a publisher reduces the number
of ads, the effectiveness may actually increase.
When an online publisher has too much ad inventory,
the industry practice is to use it for home ads.
At one point, there were reports that a few leading
sites were allocating about 1/3 of their ad inventory
to home ads. This is not a good use of that space
and it makes the publisher look bad in front of
consumers.
E-mail
ads work
It is a big mistake to equate advertising on the
Internet to banner ads. E-mail ads can be very effective
since they are direct. They can be used effectively
to build deep relationships with existing customers
and to recruit new customers. They are great vehicles
to alert consumers about dropping prices. Using
the principles of permission marketing, e-mail can
become an interactive communication and relationship-building
tool with consumers.
E-mail ads can also be viral if used appropriately.
Creating an innovative message that consumers would
love to pass on to their friends is an underrated
tactic.
When Mobile Commerce takes off, text messaging (or
SMS) will be a similar ad medium. These messages
are direct, quick and short. They are essentially
e-mail messages for those on the go.
Final
word
Wherever there are people, there will be ads. The
trick is to design ads that communicate the desired
message to the right people at the right time. Ads
can add to the consumer experience and they do not
have to be intrusive. Ads can work- if they are
designed well, i.e., keeping the consumer in mind.
|