Home Inbox Archives Write for Us
* Strategic Issues
* E-Business Issues
* Strategic Brand Management
* Agency-Related Matters
* Forum
* Case Study
* Perspectives
* Review
* Foreword
* Lets Talk
Advertise with us
Why SM?
Advertising rates

  Magazines
    Gen.Mgmt.Review
Investor's Guide
Brand Equity
Corporate Dossier
   
  ET Live Quotes
Type the name of the company to get the latest BSE/NSE stock quote
   
  ET Headlines
  Stocks
  Forex
  World
 


Managing Channels for Results
___________________________________________

MANAGING CHANNELS FOR RESULTS
In today’s fast changing environment, supply chain management is assuming growing importance. Adam J. Fein analyses the macro trends of the SCM industry and suggests strategies for success in channel marketing.

Supply chains and marketing channels are being redrawn as e-business, consolidation, and power retailers alter the relationship between manufacturer, distributor and customer. This evolution is much more complicated that the naïve predictions that distributors would be “disintermediated” as customers and manufacturers established direct relationships. But how can manufacturers best leverage their existing marketing channels to grow sales in this era of uncertainty?
Every three years, the National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors sponsors a major trend study titled Facing the Forces of Change that examines the future of distribution channels. The most recent edition, written by Pembroke Consulting, sheds lights on strategies for manufacturers who still need the services of an independent distributor or dealer channel.

We found e-business is a powerful tool for increasing market share in business-to-business industries, particularly for manufacturers that rely on intermediaries to reach end-customers. However,
e-business also calls for rethinking traditional approaches to channel management.

Macro Trends
Here are seven of the most important channel trends identified in our study:
* Wholesaler-distributors will continue play an important role in marketing channels and supply chains. As we enter the 21st century, wholesale distribution remains an important force in market-oriented economic systems. In the United States, wholesale distribution contributes 7 percent of U.S. national income and accounts for one in every 20 US jobs.

* Online ordering will be adopted slowly. Custom-ers will adopt new
e-business technologies when it benefits them and limit technology usage when the technology does not help them. In Facing the Forces of Change: Future Scenarios for Wholesale Distribution, we found that the percentage of orders received on-line will grow substantially, but not overtake more traditional methods within the next five years. In other words, the phone, fax and sales rep will remain common modes of order placement in B2B channels despite the Internet and other new technologies.

* The distribution sales force will be under increasing pressure. As customers begin to educate themselves by relying on the manufacturer for product information, the value of a distributor’s sales force is being reduced in the eyes of customers. Today, customers and purchasing managers are increasingly using the Internet to bypass sales channels and directly gather product specifications, warranty and rebate information, material safety data sheets, and potential suppliers.

* Manufacturers will explore new distribution options. Third-party logistics providers, who have traditionally been package-handling enterprises, are moving “inside the box” by offering product-handling services such as warehouse management, order processing, pick/pack/ship, just-in-time parts delivery, and many other “wholesale distribution” functions. Manufacturers are also turning to logistics companies to provide “master distribution” services to the highly fragmented industrial distribution channel.

* Manufacturer-Distributor relationships will evolve. Manufacturers and distributors continue to rely on each other’s actions and resources. Simultaneously, each side struggles to maintain autonomy and control over its own operations in this era of dynamic uncertainty. This mutual dependency creates conflicts about direction, strategy, and commitments. The trends highlighted above suggest a more uncertain era for manufacturer-distributor relationships.

Strategies for Success
Manufacturers can profit from new developments in channel marketing with three interrelated strategies.

1. Understand the End-Customer’s Buying Process
Too many manufacturers remain insulated from customers by channel relationships. Reaching all but the largest customers requires manufacturers to cede responsibility for sales and fulfillment to distributors and other intermediaries. Management at industrial and technology companies further heightens their isolation from the marketplace by devoting their energies to designing top-quality products without regard to the process by which customers purchase and use the product.

Manufacturers must understand their end-user’s current and future purchasing priorities in order to generate market share gains from new technologies. What’s more, e-business and channel investments will be squandered and unproductive without a clear understanding of what end-customers require from the buying process – beyond a first-rate product.

Consider the changes in business procurement. During the past 10 years, business customers have focused on improving efficiencies in their inbound supply chain by consolidating supply contracts, implementing integrated supply agreements, installing e-procurement systems, experimenting with reverse auctions, and rationalising vendors.

To respond, manufacturers must identify the winning channels and partner with them to retain access to customers. The winner might be a distribution intermediary with sophisticated transactional services, such as electronic data interchange and e-procurement support. Or the winner could be an integrated e-procurement vendor who controls access to customers.

The key to picking the winners comes from truly understanding the way in which end-customers procure your products. For example, customers in business-to-business channels face enormous organisational costs for procurement, purchasing and inventory maintenance. A distributor or channel that lowers a customer’s total cost of acquisition is generally preferred over one that simply offers a lower price.
The successful evolution and transformation of a go-to-market channel occurs in response to changes in the requirements of customers. By developing early partnerships with the best channel in the eyes of end-customers, manufacturers can better leverage their resources and meet the needs of more powerful and demanding customers.

Manufacturers need to under-stand how end-user customers buy and want - not just which products they buy or who they are. This requires research and insight about the “how” of product selection, not simply the “what” decision. Products are a means to an end in the eyes of a buyer. Product satisfaction surveys and feature/function market research miss the behavioral trends that provide clues to the evolving channel.

2. Restructure the Economics of Your Channel Partners
E-business is unbundling channel activities by giving customers lower cost, higher service alternatives to the sub-components of traditional go-to-market. Unbundling requires new approaches to channel compensation.
For example, the Internet overcomes traditional cost limitations of geography, time, or number of customers, giving manufacturers an affordable way to take greater control over the information (not product) flow to the customer. This represents a shift from the era when smaller customers would rely more heavily on a local sales rep to get technical and business help.

These developments create an opportunity for manufacturers to redefine traditional channel economics because the value of a distributor’s sales force is reduced in the eyes of customers. The challenges to traditional channels are not online exchanges or direct-buy strategies. Instead, our research shows that e-business squeezes channel profits as some, but not all, functions are shifted away from the traditional channel. Either overhead shrinks or distributors must find other ways to justify their gross margin.

When this transition has occurred in channels such as pharma-ceuticals or automobiles, channel margins drop since the intermediary is adding less value. Yet our research shows that busi-ness customers are reluctant to migrate their entire purchasing process to a direct on-line relationship if it means sacrificing local service, technical support, or complex fulfillment requirements.

Manufacturers can manage the fragmenting roles of their traditional channel using functional discounts programs. In a functional discount program, distributors are compensated so that payments (discount off list) are tied to the actual activities being performed by the channel.

Customers, not manufacturers, are best positioned to determine the value provided by their channel. That’s another reason that deep insight about end-customer behavior becomes invaluable to implementing an
e-business strategy.

3. Lead from the Top
Manufacturers stand at the top of the supply chain and can use a variety of sales, marketing, and physical distribution systems to connect their products with customers. Therefore, they are well positioned to evaluate the business needs of their distribution channel partners before implementing new technologies and programs. Technology link-ages in the channel must benefit customers as well as demonstrate a clear return on investment for distributors and dealers.

Leadership begins by knowing your channel partners and assessing their competencies and performance. Yet we freq-uently encounter industrial manufacturers with e-business and channel management initiatives but without formal distributor evaluation programs.

Evaluations should be conducted yearly and include both quantitative and qualitative assessments. Quantitative measures can include the distributor’s purchase patterns, pricing abilities, and market share. Qualitative assessment can include the strength of the distributor’s management, the effectiveness of their growth plans, and overall customer experience they offer.

Here are a few specific questions to begin a qualitative evaluation of e-business with a channel partner:
*“What plans do you have for upgrading your technology systems?”
Establishing and maintaining technology is costly. Many smaller distributors do not have the available capital to make the needed investments in technology or to build private exchanges for their manufacturers. For others, the initial investment, along with the integration and ongoing maintenance, negates the benefits of communicating electronically with suppliers.

*“How will we work together to avoid disappoint-ing customers”?
A customer will expect a seamless experience when interacting with systems that link distributors and manufacturers. This interaction raises the stakes, because customer management and inventory systems must be seamlessly integrated across the channel. This complexity of operations and interactions creates increased opportunities to perform below a customer’s expectations. Develop knowledge of customer’s buying preferences to help design these systems for a sales channel.

*“What are your future strategic objectives?”
A critical part of channel evaluation is an assessment of distributor and dealer growth plans. Not all distributors and dealers will want to grow. For those that do, the desire to grow starts with senior management and permeates the company’s business practices, service culture and compensation plans. Growth plans must be realistic, reflecting the investments and skills required to sell new products or to sell to new customers. Dealers and distributors must be able to articulate the reasons why a customer buys from them and have a clear plan for how technology fits into their company.

Business relationships between manufacturers and distributors are not altruistic, nor should they be. A strategic perspective on evolving channel systems will create a better and more effective go-to-market strategy.

© 2002 Pembroke Consulting, Inc. Adam J. Fein is President of Pembroke Consulting, Inc., a strategy and marketing consulting firm. He is the author of Facing the Forces of Change: Future Scenarios for Wholesale Distribution

 

Rate this article





 
Back to top
What do You want to say on
Rural Marketing

Should stockbrokers be barred from sharing client-specific information with third parties?
Vote
Are you
satisfied with Strategic Marketing
(you can make difference)
Times Group Sites-The Times Of India  | The Economic Times | ET Invest | ETintelligence | Femina  | Filmfare  |  Navbharat Times |  Times Classifieds  |  Property Times  |  Education Times |  Maharashtra Times | Responservice  | Indianadsabroad  | Jobs & Careers  | Times Multimedia