Home Inbox Archives Write for Us
Strategic Issues
E-Business lssues
Strategic Brand Management
Agency-Related Matters
Customer first
Chiefly Speaking
Outside In
Perspectives
Review
Foreword
Lets Talk

Advertise with us
Why SM?
Advertising rates

  Magazines
Gen.Mgmt.Review
Investor's Guide
Brand Equity
Corporate Dossier
   
 
  ET Headlines
  Stocks
  Forex
  World
 

AND
MAN LEARNT TO BRAND SAND


Sampa Chakrabarty Lahiri ||______________________________________
SM Research Team


Surely, dirt is no longer just dirt," said the client, a marketing manager for diatomaceous earth, a chalky white mineral used as an industrial absorbent and filtration medium and sold to a range of customers, from quarries to multibillion-dollar food processors.

Indeed, when it comes to commodity products, the burden of proof is almost always on the marketer to show why this handful of dirt is better and worth more to the customer than that handful. It is a marketing argument that may have as much to do with the way the dirt is packaged, delivered and used as it does with the dirt's actual quality and characteristics. Whatever is involved, it is a task that the marketer must accept and be prepared to handle with a savvy sense of the differing needs and cost points of the relevant marketplace.

Some of the organisations, who have mastered the art of marketing a commodity, defined as a specific group of lowly differentiated products or services with high levels of substitutability and straightforward price discovery, have outlined a step-by-step approach to develop an effective marketing strategy to do so. And the said approach is built around "branding" i.e. creating a mutually acknowledged relationship between the supplier and buyer that transcends isolated transactions or specific individuals to achieve superior and sustainable share and price premiums, even in the most adverse of markets.

Here is how to turn commodities into branded goods.
The four steps to branding
The four-steps of branding commodities are as follows:
1. Carving up the market from every angle and to identify those customers who are responsive to differentiation.

In the markets of commodity goods, price is usually the only differentiator. But if you can brand those goods and bundle them with services, even bricks and sand can command premium prices.

2. Differentiating the offering in one or more of the six "generic" dimensions of differentiation.
3. Bundling several differentiations into a brand and communicating the same consistently and strongly.
4. Aligning the business capabilities to reinforce and to defend the brand and the underlying sources of differentiation.

1. Carving up the market
Carving up the market is the critical first step. Commodity marketers who know who will pay for differentiation, how much can be invested in the differentiation process and what benefits are of value to their customers can begin to build a brand. Those who instead apply a shotgun approach will likely run out of money before they see results.
Successful commodity marketers must start by recognising that no market is truly homogeneous. Carving up the market goes well beyond traditional segmentation. It is a deliberate process to find those customers who need, appreciate and will pay for differentiation. In place of the traditional psychographic or demographic approaches, the first step here is to conduct a disciplined behavioural segmentation of the market by examining the actual purchase patterns of the customers. In this case, three distinct classes of customers are identified viz. Gold Standard Customers, Potentials and Incorrigibles.

A. Gold Standard Customers
These are the customers whose concerns exceed a narrow fixation with rock-bottom price. They will pay a premium for offerings that deliver true value in terms of process enhancements, cost reduction or benefits to end-users. They typically represent a small portion, anywhere from 5 to 25 percent, of the total market.

In search for quality wheat
Australian Wheat Board scans the global markets looking for buyers who are seeking high-quality wheat with very specific characteristics. While most wheat buyers require wheat to meet only two or three specifications, demanding buyers such as the Japanese may have a list of 20 requirements. By seeking out the most demanding customers and efficiently matching them with hard-to-find supplies that meet their requirements, the Wheat Board is able to extract a significant premium in a business where most competition is based solely on price.
Source www.strategy-business.com

The true Gold Standard commodity customers will consider long-term, strategic partnerships with multiple levels of client interaction. They are usually a lot more demanding than other market segments and they are also willing to pay for their demands (See box: In search for quality wheat). And the commodity marketers are ready to go a long way to gain their confidence.

B. Potentials
A larger segment of the market, generally ranging from 30 to 45 percent, places a higher emphasis on pure price, but is occasionally willing to entertain the notion of selective relationships involving certain products or services. Customers in this segment have some degree of interest in partnering although they shy away from long-term commitments. This group sometimes even includes traditional cost managers. Because they are concerned with delivered cost, it is possible on occasion to interest them in opportunities to reduce network costs, including transportation, delivery and warehousing. And supply-risk managers, rather than fixating exclusively on cost, are primarily concerned about the potential to avoid supply interruptions. Once it is possible to move the dialogue beyond delivered price, the potential for differentiation exists.

Rhône-Poulenc branded sand
In a last-ditch effort to rejuvenate a disappointing silica business, Rhône-Poulenc's re-searchers were developing highly dispersible silica, or HDS, for vehicle tires, which made it possible for the first time to decrease rolling resistance without diminishing wet traction. As a result, HDS was priced at premiums up to 75 per cent over common grades of silica. And as fleet fuel efficiency standards grew tougher in the United States, Rhône-Poulenc entered into a long-term agreement to provide a major manufacturer with HDS silica. The customer would use HDS to produce tires that could provide up to 9 percent higher fuel efficiency than those made with standard silica.
Source www.strategy-business.com

C. Incorrigibles
No matter what one does, customers are not going to love one. One can rent their affection but only until his money runs out. These are not strategic thinkers. They are tightly focused on a single goal: making the best possible deal on the transaction at hand.
These are the pure price buyers, who treat suppliers as the enemy and focus exclusively on current delivered price. They will switch suppliers with lightning speed for even the slightest price differential. Not only is it often a waste of time to market to these bottom-feeders, it is sometimes not even worth the trouble of having them as customers; their greatest use is often as gifts to competitors. Unfortunately, these incorrigibles constitute half the market, or more, in some commodity businesses. They are so prevalent that no supplier can seriously think about "firing" all of them.

The behavioural segmentation of the market is just the first step in understanding customer potential, albeit the most important. Marketers also need to analyse the extent to which customers truly contribute to their profitability, rather than eating up profits by failing to pay the true cost-to-serve. The result of these segmentations is a short list of the customers around which real marketing can take place.

The next step is to acquire an in-depth appreciation of the needs of these customers. The supplier must develop insights into needs the customer might not be able to either articulate or even understand. That means understanding not only the needs of the direct customer but sometimes also those of an end user, the true customer. (See box: Rhône-Poulenc branded sand) This becomes necessary when the direct buyer, someone internal or external who is other than the true customer, is acting as an agent and does not appreciate all the nuances involved in the commodity's actual use. Getting "close to the customer" may have become a cliché, but that doesn't negate the underlying concept. Insight requires understanding, and understanding requires proximity.

2. Differentiate
Commodity differentiation must be tangible, robust and capable of withstanding intense scrutiny. The marketed offering must significantly enhance some element of the customer's value chain in ways other competitors cannot match. This requires the development of a unique, tangible source of value - technological and engineering support, special distribution and delivery or specific application of the commodity product to the end user. Once in place, that differentiated source of value is difficult for competitors to duplicate.

There are always ways to differentiate, through both how you add value and how you deliver it. Value is created in commodity products through improving the consistency of the offering, making it more convenient or aggressively customizing it to the customer's operation. This value can be delivered either through the product itself or through service enhancement. (See box: Dow cashes in on growing need for value) Exhibit I demonstrates what happens when one combines the two different dimensions.

What results from that combination are the six "generic" ways to differentiate:
A. Quality Control: Value from Product Consistency.
Today's buyers are more fastidious about quality of the product they buy than ever before.

Dow cashes in on growing need for value
The Dow Chemical Company was one of the first suppliers to capitalize on this growing interest in value. In the late 1980's, it developed and branded "The Diamond Service Plan," through which it guaranteed a response within 24 hours to any customer question or problem involving its chemicals. Dow built an infrastructure that allowed it to provide, within the promised time, a broad range of technical support regarding its products and their application. Dow's branding of service has been enormously successful. It has paid dividends in terms of market share, customer loyalty and price premiums. Because of this service and the partnerships it has produced,Dow enjoys high plant utilization and low plant complexity, leading to low costs and correspondingly high margins. Moreover, by investing in an infrastructure that could deliver a unique service, Dow succeeded in providing a valuable offering that its competitors have yet to match.
Source www.strategy-business.com

B. Reliability: Value from consistent service
Over the past decade, new quality standards have driven a significant behavioural change among chemical buyers, for example. Many customers now understand the importance of reliable quality and supply, as well as consistent service.
They encourage their suppliers to fully understand their value chain - and those of their own customers - in order to foster partnerships that create value over time.

C. Packaging: Value from Product Convenience.
Consistent quality and service, though essential, constitute only the most basic forms of differentiation. Adding convenience to consistency provides a major new dimension to the offering, making it substantially harder for competitors to match.

D. Taking Responsibility: Value from Convenient Service
Delivering supplies as soon as customers order them is important. Automatically supplying them on time without the customer having to place an order is infinitely better.

E. Matching: Value from Product Customisation
The wheat market provides a clear example of selective customers - the Gold Standard customers described earlier - who are willing to pay a premium to a supplier who can match them with the exact commodity they need.

F. Knowledge-based Applications: Value from Customised Service
The most intense form of differentiation also requires the deepest involvement in the customer's operations. Exhaustive knowledge of the customer's processes can be used to provide substantial value and pave the way for long-term partnering relationships.

3. Bundle
If the supplier can bundle multiple sources offering, the challenge facing competitors becomes immense.
Defining and delivering a differentiated attribute that provides real value to the customer is essential, but not necessarily sufficient. Often, a single attribute can be matched or at least neutralized by agile competitors. Differentiation tied to a specific product is the most tenuous basis for branding. Ideally, commodity branding is associated with an offering (the basic product or service enhanced by various forms of differentiation) rather than with a particular product. The goal is to bundle multiple sources of differentiation and then to fight ferociously to prevent competitors from unbundling them.

In the end, the goal is first to build the brand identification with a bundle of integrated offerings, and then to extend the brand relationship to the institutional level, where it affords the greatest opportunities for leverage.

Striking the right chord with customers
The objective of institutional branding is to create customer relationships that are broad and deep - broader than the traditional link between a salesman and a purchasing manager, and deeper than a teenager's emotional attachment to a particular brand of designer jeans. In commodity brand relationships, those emotional bonds are replaced by shared goals and common values. For example, one major agribusiness supplier believes that, when toe-to-toe with competitors, ethics and culture are our tie-breakers.

Du Pont grooms its resin
Polyethylene resin is a commodity used in making plastic products ranging from trash cans to freezer storage bags. Du Pont's tests showed that pipes made from its Alathon 25 resin were 5 percent more durable than competitive products. But despite several years of price cuts, Du Pont failed to persuade pipe manufacturers that its product was worth a premium.
Finally, Du Pont launched an all-out program to educate its customers about the true value of its higher-grade resin. It produced a detailed analysis of the comparative costs involved in installing and maintaining in-ground irrigation pipe made from Alathon versus the competitors' standard resin. The direct savings from the reduced need to buy replacement pipe turned out to be fairly minimal. The real savings - 10 times the savings on new pipe - came from the diminished need to pay the labor and crop damage costs associated with digging up and replacing the underground pipe. As a result, Du Pont was able to increase the price of Alathon by 7 percent, resulting in an overall premium of nearly 38 percent, and still see its sales double the following year.
The people who market Du Pont's chemicals and mineral products understand they have a considerable advantage because of the company's reputation for innovation, reliability and stability. Even if there is nothing particularly innovative about a specific product they might be selling, one manager acknowledged, "people buy from us because we are Du Pont". That is the essence of commodity branding.
Source www.strategy-business.com

Brand marketing requires multiple points of company-to-company contact as both partners seek mutual ways to create value through aligned processes, applications and capabilities (See box: Du Pont grooms its resin). It demands an entirely new focus on relationships rather than transactions, on offerings rather than products, on premiums rather than discounts. Relationships used to be one to one - now it's across the company and across the customer.

Effective communication of the brand
All these require effective communication of the brand. But years of disappointing experience, stemming from the costly and inappropriate use of consumer marketing techniques, have made commodity suppliers wary. Indeed, some have an almost pathological fear of communication in general, and of advertising in particular.
Well-targeted, sharply focussed communication does work well in commodity markets; it just doesn't bear much resemblance to the mass advertising most commodity suppliers automatically associate with brand marketing. The key is to communicate the value clearly, using economics rather than emotion.

4. Deliver
The extraction of a premium for a differentiated offering demands that the supplier make good on the promise of added value. Execution is critical; the supplier must have the business systems and processes required to deliver the marketed offering.

It must also have the business systems to not deliver to customers who do not pay for it. The Australian Wheat Board has to locate and deliver the high-quality wheat it promises. Tires containing Rhône-Poulenc's HDS silica have to provide increased fuel efficiency. And irrigation pipe made from Du Pont's Alathon 25 polyethylene resin has to last longer and produce tangible savings in replacement costs.

Offer real value
When commodity buyers pay a premium for value, it can't be skin deep. The value has to be real and tangible, because they will constantly measure and reevaluate it. If the customer paid for the highest quality product or the highest level of service, then that is what the customer has to get. At the same time, business systems must enforce internal discipline to insure that buyers of the most basic commodities are not over-served.

Re-educating the sales people
Changes in the business capabilities are not restricted to production and logistics, but are even more important on the "soft side" - customer management. Employing a traditional sales force to market a branded commodity is the epitome of the Pogo Principle: "We have met the enemy and he is us."

Pricing - a difficult task anyway
Commodity suppliers are accustomed to charging a wide range of prices; the rational basis underlying those price variations is not always evident. But haphazard pricing practices will not support a long-term branding strategy. Marketing branded commodities involves a set of basic pricing principles as appended below:

* Be aware of the true cost of differentiation
Commodity suppliers, rather than risking the loss of a customer by demanding a premium, often provide a particular service upon request. Over time, they incrementally increase the value of their offering without extracting an appropriate premium. And this ultimately proves to be ruinous. Effective branding requires an accurate calculation of the true cost of initiating, delivering and supporting the offering.

* Command value for differences
This is evident as was obvious in the case of Du Pont's irrigation pipe in which a 5 percent difference in durability did not seem particularly significant until customers were educated about the substantial costs associated with replacing worn-out pipe lying beneath cultivated fields.

* Understand the true value of the offering
It is needful to understand the true value of the offering in terms of the customer's operations and ability to switch. One producer of refractory brick charges a premium for its high-grade brick but that premium pales in comparison with the the enormous cost of taking down a glass furnace for repairs stemming from the use of inferior brick.

* Do not allow differentiation to be unbundled
Differentiation should not be allowed to be unbundled, either by competitors or by your own sales force. The bundled offering is the core of the brand.

* Be prepared for trade-offs between volume and price
Effective marketers must be prepared to make continuous and complex trade-offs between volume and price. That means deliberately surrendering market share on occasion when the tide is running the wrong way, then moving aggressively to regain share when conditions are right. It requires a dynamic, day-to-day approach that the Australian Wheat Board describes as "guerrilla marketing" - prowling world markets for opportunities that play to your strengths and passing up fights when the cost of victory appears too high.

* Maintain market discipline
A successful pricing strategy requires the supplier to maintain market discipline - a deliberate, unemotional approach to outbreaks of price wars. It requires careful analysis of what competitors are doing, and why, in order to avoid misreading signals that might actually point to a spot phenomenon or geographical aberration rather than across-the-board price cuts. It is imperative to avoid getting panicked into price slashing, which undercuts the long-term strategy.
Source www.strategy-business.com


Brand marketing requires massive re-education, new values and tailored incentives. Traditionally, commodity salespeople have had two concerns: volume and the immediate transaction. Their basic tactic is to enhance their personal relationship with the buyers. To close the deal, they will offer practically anything, culminating in the pitch: "I know what the rate card says, but here's what I'll do for you." And that approach will spell disaster when applied to brand marketing. With alarming speed, the salespeople will un-bundle your offerings. They will erase your premiums. They will offer unfathomable discounts. Left to their own devices, they will destroy your brand faster than any marketing effort can build it back up.

A Self-Test For Commodities
"Commodity markets" is a term used so often that it tends to be meaningless. Rather than debate the definition, the following test may be suggested: Which, if any, of the following five characteristics apply to ones market?

* Customers evaluate each purchase
Customers carefully evaluate each and every purchase. In some markets, purchases are made automatically and receive little or no scrutiny. Even if consumers had the time and inclination, few possess the resources or technical capability to accurately compare competing offerings. In fact, the consumer is paying for the luxury of not having to think about the purchase. The brand offers instant clues - highest quality, lowest cost, reliable service, greatest cachet - that relieve the consumer of the effort required to weigh the pros and cons of each purchase systematically. Commodity buyers possess not only the resources and capability but also the incentive to evaluate each purchase. The risk factor involved in each purchase far surpasses those faced by consumers and justifies the investment in increased attention.

* The true customer is anonymous
The product is purchased by a buyer or agent who is not the final user of the product and who may not appreciate subtle but important differences. For example, in the case of the Australian Wheat Board, in which different wheat characteristics make for tremendous differences to an end user, like a baker. A sudden change in supply can result in loaves of bread an inch too high or too low. However, sellers of wheat deal not with bakers, but with a purchasing agent, who is often located far away at a flour mill, and who may have little appreciation for the differences in performance that even small variations can create. The baker is the true customer, not the purchasing agent or the miller, but is anonymous to the wheat board.

* You have dumb competitors
Not all competitors act in ways that support market-focussed strategies. In fact, the traditional commodity strategy of pure lowest price based on lowest cost rarely works in practice. Even a supplier that truly has the lowest costs and prices accordingly is vulnerable to price wars initiated by aggressive competitors gunning for volume and share. Nonetheless, many competitors persist in rushing to market with well-disguised but inferior product offerings, emphasising price, price and price.

Pricing
Few issues are more problematic for commodity marketers than pricing. There are very few commodity marketers that sell on the basis of value - it appears to be a foreign concept. The norm, instead, is cutthroat bidding aimed at moving volume.

The traditional commodity pricing mentality dictates that all consumers must pay the same price, with reasonable adjustments for transportation and volume. That view of the marketplace is blatantly wrong. The notion that all customers of lowly differentiated commodities pay essentially the same price is a myth. In one commodity segment, for example, an analysis of more than 100 customers found that 61 percent were paying a price that varied by more than 10 percent from the moving average. In some cases, customers purchasing comparable volume paid effective prices that differed by multiples of three or four. And in general, the largest discounts were enjoyed by the smaller-volume purchasers (See Box: Pricing - a difficult task anyway).

To sum it up all, man has now learnt to brand all the mundane objects with dexterity. And within reasonable limits, successful commodity branding has yielded a substantial payoff in the form of a brand premium. However, marketing has been found to carry major risks as research shows that while effective marketing can bring commodity businesses with high returns, ineffective marketing is worse than no marketing at all. However, given the economics of commodity businesses, the margin for error is incredibly thin. And the key to success is to take a disciplined, deliberate approach that begins with the market, to understand how to create and to deliver value and, most importantly, to figure out how to get paid for it. Getting paid for it requires branding and extending the relationship beyond the transaction to encompass the full organisation.

References:
* The above article has been abstracted /condensed from the views of the following articles/books. All rights of the authors and
publishers are reserved.
* Segmenting Customers in Mature Industrial Markets: An Application, Rangan, V. Kasturi, Harvard Business School,
Case Study 9-594-089, 1994
* Strategy and Tactics of Pricing, Nagle, Thomas T., and Holden,
Reed A., Prentice Hall, 1995
* The Effect of Marketing Orientation on Business Profitability, Narver, John C., and Slater, Stanley F., Journal of Marketing, October 1990
* How to brand sand, Hill, Sam I., McGrath, Jack, and Dayal Sandeep, www.strategy-business.com
* Strategy-Management-Competition, Second Quarter, 1998

Feeback on this article may be emailed to:
smeditor@indiatimes.co

 

Rate this article




Back to top

Should stockbrokers be barred from sharing client-specific information with third parties?
Vote
Are you
satisfied with Strategic Marketing
(you can make difference)
Times Group Sites-The Times Of India  | The Economic Times | ET Invest | ETintelligence | Femina  | Filmfare  |  Navbharat Times |  Times Classifieds  |  Property Times  |  Education Times |  Maharashtra Times | Responservice  | Indianadsabroad  | Jobs & Careers  | Times Multimedia