|
It
wasn't hard to keep tabs on all of this.
As a consumer, one notices these changes
since they affect one's life in some
way or the other. What came as a most
pleasant surprise however was something
you don't notice as an ad person-who-is-not-quite-a-media-person.
Amid all the sound and fury that the
TV channels create with their hoardings
and e-mailers, and the constant barrage
of pre-digested information that TAM
sends out, a low key invitation to address
a language publication's annual sales
conference two months turned out to
be a huge revelation.
While preparing for my talk I learned
that
a) in the last five years, just
two Hindi publications have added 14
million more readers to their fold.
Over half of these were added in rural
areas. They did it through a combination
of deep down to earth marketing and
new localised editions in smaller towns.
The simple but time tested method of
taking your product right to the consumer's
doorstep,
and heart, worked wonders
for them.
b) all the satellite channels
during the same period added only 12
million more viewers to their fold in
the same areas covered by these papers.
The written word is still in fashion
after all. That's very good news. Better
still, more people are learning to read,
and more people are reading the news.
Quizzing some young media planners on
their perceptions about these two newspapers
however, I was appalled to find that
they could tell me lots about serials
on niche TV channels with ratings of
less than 1 per cent, but could not
even enumerate the edition centres of
these papers. Which is not to say they
don't know their job. They are sharp,
bright and well educated - but perhaps
these times have tuned them towards
a tunnel vision - one which suggests
that the world of media planning in
June and July, 2003 AD must start and
end with discussions on CAS. A phenomenon
that will affect a princely 6 million
homes, if that, out of the 160 million
in which our consumers live.
Multiple use of media, multi-media planning,
integrated marketing, how can any or
all of these happen if we don't open
our eyes? Not just to all the 360 degree
possibilities (because new media ideas
can be quite alluring and make great
pitch material) but to the remarkable
changes taking place in all the old
familiar media as well.
Initiative Media has a simple but stupendously
effective tool that does just this.
It forces a planner to look beyond the
blinkers of TAM ratings into the wider
world of print, radio, cinema, internet,
direct response, out of home, and so
on.
The tool is imaginatively and aptly
called RADAR. What I like most about
it is that it does not start with a
multi-media reach and numbers argument
using the standard NRS or IRS data.
It starts with the consumer instead,
that too the consumer of a specific
product or service category, any category
you need to promote and for which you
are willing to conduct special research.
RADAR further subdivides the communication
task based on whether the situation
is one of launch, switch, or maintenance.
RADAR requires you to go out and meet
a sizeable number of your current or
prospective customers, and administer
a battery of about 30 simple statements.
These lay out the framework for what
they seek from the communication on
that category, followed by how they
rate various media forms in their ability
to deliver what they seek. Let me explain
with an example.
Take cars. Among the various attributes
that consumers seek from the advertising
for a car, they rate 'detail', 'attention',
and 'trust' the highest. What they mean
is that the communication should grab
their attention, should provide enough
detail for them to make an informed
choice, and should invoke trust in the
manufacturer (it is after all an expensive
purchase). They rate these attributes
as more important than what we would
have obviously thought- such as 'stature',
'image', 'self identification' etc.
But remember, these questions are asked
in the context of the media to be deployed
not the creative that will be used.
They follow this up with a rating of
the various media in being able to deliver
these attributes - sadly while television
does deliver on attention-getting, according
to them (we interviewed consumers in
Delhi and Bombay), it falls far short
on the ability to provide detail, or
indeed invoke trust. This is where the
internet and print come in. Incidentally,
while the internet is cited as capable
of delivering detail, it loses out on
the trust aspect. Cinema is a good place
to run an ad for 'the car for me' -
scoring well on self-identification.
Print is not perceived by car owner
as an attention getting medium for advertising
cars - outdoor is. However, I believe
the new full page colour campaign for
Tata Indica - showing packets of peas
and lifeboats and armchairs, but no
cars - may have managed to overcome
that.
Category
Cars,Mobile Phones,Finance,Frags/Aftershaves
,Computers, Cereals, Deodorants,Detergents,Ice
Cream,Spreads,Skincare,Garments,Watches,Insurance,etc |
|
Task
Launch, Switch, Loyalty |
|
Communication
Requirements
Attention, Involving, Identification,Ideas,Likeability,Image,Detail,New
Information,Keep in Touch,Stature,Reliability |
|
| Channel
performance against each
attribute/requirement |
Obtained
through Consumer Research
|
Here is a simple chart on how RADAR
works
What consumers seek in the advertising
for the same category can and does change
depending on whether the task is launch
or maintenance as this example from
Initiative Media, UK, for a skin care
product shows
Here is how various media fare among
soap users in Mumbai on the communication
attributes they consider most important,
which are likeability and reliability.
The product was for a particular type
of soap for which we innovatively decided
that poster ads in visiting areas in
a hospitals might be a good idea - and
consumers seemed to think rather well
of that - scoring them high on reliability
and ofcourse on ideas.
IM in India has done RADAR research
on several categories of consumers -
watches, cars, soaps, baby products,
insurance and so on. We find it invaluable
in helping us look beyond the numbers
that the audience measurement studies
throw up. Since the tool is flexible,
in that we can define media any way
we choose (though the attribute statements
must be maintained fairly standard across
the world), we broke up television by
genre in one study to find this:
That general entertainment TV does well
for categories where consumers are looking
for likeability of, and new information
in, the ad - but news channels fare
much better where the consumers expect
to find the message involving, reliable
and capable of assigning some image
to the product. Typically, FMCG products
fit into the former, while high priced
durables fit into the latter descriptions.
RADAR can also be used to provide cues
to the creative on what aspects of a
medium need to be overcome in order
to meet with a consumer's expectations
from the communication of the category.
For example, releasing full page colour
ads in print for cars is obviously a
good move when the consumer is asking
for attention getting communication,
and believes that print does not work
well in that area. On the other hand,
not giving them the detail they seek
from the same medium may well be a bad
move.
Our next attempt will be to put innovations
in the old familiar media onto the RADAR
screen. Interactivity on FM radio, cataloguing
in magazines, Doordarshan's attributes
in terrestrial-only homes, these are
some of the aspects we will cover. Watch
this space.
Feeback
on this article may be emailed to:
smeditor@indiatimes.com
|